Economics, Technology

What surf pools should learn from the auto industry…

While 2015 seems a distant memory these days, I’m sure some of you still remember the Volkswagen emissions scandal. As a new industry, we believe we need to learn from these examples, that it is important we are transparent and clear about how we compare energy consumption figures. Auto manufactures routinely show fuel consumption figures for open road driving. Telling everyone your car is the most fuel efficient at 100 kilometers per hour isn’t all that helpful if the majority of your driving is done in urban areas. Believe it or not, this same analogy also happens to work for surf pools.

Surf pools draw in surfers of all skill levels, from beginners to experts. The same wave doesn’t work for all abilities, so being able to adjust the wave from urban driving for intermediates to open road driving for experts is a necessity. Translation: you want wave pool operations which are the most efficient for the variety of operation settings you are going to use the most. The good news is that intermediate waves tend to need a bit less power than expert waves which helps your power costs.

Let’s break down what you need to consider in your equipment evaluation to avoid being misled:

  • Flexible capacity

Can you turn on just part of your pool for quiet times or do you have to run the whole system to make waves?

  • Reset time

How long does the pool have to settle before you can change the wave formation? This downtime has two consequences:

  1. Your guests will not be satisfied to be paying for long pauses between waves
  2. Your power consumption spikes when you power back up, and with other systems that first wave isn’t rideable.
  • Wave frequency

If max efficiency requires waves every eight seconds, you will probably discover that most intermediates find this too fast and get frustrated because they can’t catch the waves in the cadence they come. If you slow the wave cadence down what happens to your energy costs?

This is why you don’t want to look at energy per hour because it includes differences in rest and frequency.

 Consumption per wave

If you want to make a true comparison, break the numbers down to a per wave metric which removes any difference in frequency and measures ‘apples to apples’ in cost per wave. Cost per wave divided by capacity then links directly to anticipated ROI.

It’s important to note that less power consumption doesn’t equal energy efficiency. If you get fewer surfable waves per session, that isn’t efficient, and more importantly, it doesn’t result in high guest satisfaction.

The freedom of flexibility: make power a variable cost

Endless Surf gives your venue the flexibility to operate half the number of chambers based on capacity, which enables you to control your costs in tune with your revenue. You can choose to run one side only, shorter waves, or reduce the frequency of the waves based on the number of people in the pool. Other systems are binary, either all on or off which makes power a fixed, not variable cost—not helpful on a quiet day.

Flexibility also means being able to set wave frequency according to who is in the pool, so that your power usage relates directly to satisfying your guests. High frequency, high power waves for experts or lower frequency, lower power waves for intermediates (and beginners cost you very little as they enjoy the whitewater that span out towards the end of the wave).

Power is only one aspect of operating costs; you also need to factor in maintenance costs and lifespan and replacement costs. Then, of course, there is the cost of downtime either due to reliability or maintenance.

Lifetime value: the true cost of your equipment choice

Lifetime value calculations for Endless Surf shape up well. Not only is our cost per wave very competitive but because our equipment isn’t in the water, our maintenance costs are much lower. Anyone in the marine industry will tell you water isn’t a kind element for technology, and corrosion decreases the life span. If you can’t take the equipment out of the water for servicing then you need specialist scuba diving technicians—probably not a plentiful resource you can price check, even if you had the freedom to do so, and weren’t tied into expensive maintenance contracts.

The longevity of any of the products on the market has yet to be truly tested because these venues are all new, except those pools with pneumatic waves that WhiteWater installed 30 years ago which still operate smoothly, producing reliable waves. It is a heritage which proves the longevity of the pneumatic technology Endless Surf has advanced. As for down time, ask the parks that have been changing wave patterns on the press of a button for decades; a pneumatic system based on air chambers doesn’t require the same pool settling reset time.

A fair price means no hidden on-going costs

In Endless Surf, we wanted to create a system which gave venues the flexibility to manage waves according to their capacity needs and the level of the surfers in the pool. As a WhiteWater product, we stand by the reliability, longevity, and safety our reputation is based on. Our mission is to help venues thrive, and that support follows through to writing fair terms. We don’t believe in costly royalty and license fees; ongoing costs are minimal to support software upgrades you’ll want as we enhance our Wave Doctor software further and Surf Concierge.

A good deal is based on an honest relationship and transparent fees and pricing, something Volkswagen learned the hard way.

Share

NEWSLETTER

FOLLOW

Instagram
LinkedIn

RELATED POSTS

总体拥有成本:冲浪池的建设与运营

任何成功的商业项目都需要评估其投入资本的回报情况。冲浪乐园也不例外。作为场地的核心,冲浪池可能是成本最高、也无疑是最重要的组成部分。为了确保投资回报率(ROI)达到预期,开发商和投资者必须全面考量冲浪池的总体拥有成本。我们购物时,往往只关注标价,却未将持续性成本纳入考量。购车便是绝佳例证——人们常会忽略高昂的燃油费和保险费,甚至还有昂贵的保养服务费用。在冲浪池领域,全生命周期成本(TCO)可概括为:购置冲浪池技术的成本,加上建造及长期运营所需的各项开支。 设备本身和建设等前期成本会因冲浪场地的具体需求而有所不同。通常,规模是这些成本估算中的主要因素,因为开发商需要在规模(泳池占地面积)与性能(浪质、冲浪时长等)之间权衡,以找到那个“最佳平衡点”。一个冲浪池在规模上应足够大,以满足冲浪者对浪况的需求;但在成本方面,又应足够小,以实现更低的总拥有成本(TCO)和更高的投资回报率(ROI)(点击此处深入了解为何规模至关重要!)。另一方面,运营成本是持续存在的。虽然无法避免,但通过合理选择技术方案,完全可以将其降至最低。归根结底,总拥有成本包含多个层面,而节省(或损失)从新项目破土动工的那一刻起就已经开始了。让我们深入探讨…… 建设考量 首先,冲浪乐园需要建造。无论场馆的规模大小如何,建造冲浪池都绝非易事。例如,许多项目要求占地面积至少为2-5+英亩,但通常会根据场馆的整体规模而更大。 SURFTOWN MUC建设现场的航拍图,展示了无极冲浪湾技术 在此阶段,需要考虑施工过程中的诸多要素,包括: 占地面积 所需挖掘量 土壤密封…
了解更多

灵活的冲浪池运营是冲浪乐园成功的重要因素

自从我们进入内陆冲浪公园市场以来,我们就把无极冲浪湾的目标定为提供最优质的冲浪体验,以及业界最高效且可持续的系统。我们已经阐述了造浪和个性化,也谈过了商业模式和环境的可持续努力。现在,让我们深入探讨冲浪池的能效,并了解无极冲浪湾能为冲浪乐园带去的操作灵活性和能耗节约效果。 著名的造浪池能源之争 业界对于能耗的争论相当激烈,焦点集中于冲浪池满功率运行时的能耗。然而,随着无极冲浪湾在冲浪池灵活性方面的研发,我们必须指出一些观点的出发点是不切实际的。前几年,曾有汽车制造商称汽车在时速为100英里时最省油。但实际上,如果大部分时间车主都在市区驾驶的话,这个说法自然没有什么参考价值。并非所有波浪都是一个模子刻出来的,我们可以从汽车行业里总结出适用于冲浪池的经验教训。 https://cdn.endlesssurf.cn/2022/05/OPTIMIZE.mp4 汽车的燃油效率并非在现实日常驾驶场景下,而是在最理想的无交通障碍的高速公路条件下定义的。气动系统的效率测量与此类似。但无极冲浪湾所探讨的气动系统的灵活性,是与技术以及场所的日常运营相结合的,即在任何情况下,都能根据情况优化能耗。 灵活运营是冲浪乐园未来必需 基于目前的测量结果,目前所有技术所造出的相同大小的人造波浪消耗的能量几乎相同,因此各技术的关键性差别在于灵活性。 无极冲浪湾能够让运营商根据游客量、游客冲浪水平和偏好来定制波浪。通过便捷易用的软件浪涌工作室(Swell Studio),造浪可以变得前所未有的个性化。运营商可以在同一场次里定制不同的浪型;也可以根据客流量定制波浪——这对营收是非常有利的。 无极冲浪湾与目前市场上其他冲浪池不同,它不仅仅只有关闭或全效运行两种模式。这样既可节省整体能源消耗,又可确保场地无须浪费不必要的能源。…
了解更多

得益于全球冲浪热潮,冲浪乐园建成即能成为热点

冲浪正在风靡全球。许多地区的冲浪人口正在大幅增长(美国冲浪人口仅7年就增长了94%),而全球冲浪市场规模预计将在2027年达到48亿美元。冲浪行业的快速发展完全没有放缓的迹象,特别是在冲浪成为奥运会正式项目之后。作为对这一巨大增长的回应,冲浪乐园正在迅速成为投资者和开发商寻求差异化和健康的ROI的、最热门的新开发类型之一。 随着全球数百个冲浪乐园的开发,我们正在进入全球冲浪开发热潮,而越来越多的开发者意识到了冲浪池能带来的好处。人们对冲浪的渴望达到了历史最高点,我们相信,得益于全球冲浪热潮,冲浪乐园建成即能成为热点。 善用冲浪乐园发展热潮 关于冲浪池的好消息是,许多开发类型都可以从冲浪中获得好处。 单纯的冲浪场馆不再是核心商业模式,因为大多数开发商都在利用冲浪池来锚定其他关键的商业目标。从多功能都市空间到娱乐综合体,甚至高尔夫场地,冲浪池帮助提高房地产投资回报的潜力是巨大的。目前利用冲浪乐园热潮的主要场地类型有: 多功能都市空间 高端社区 酒店度假村 运动生活方式中心 高尔夫场地…
了解更多

回顾造浪池发展历史中技术飞跃的几次里程碑时刻(二)

大约一年前,当我们推出无极冲浪湾时,我开始回顾白水在制造气动波方面的悠久历史(点击此处阅读第一部分的历史回顾)。几十年来,我一直深度参与这些项目,看到业内众多创新者共同取得的进步,实在令人惊叹。正如第一部分所详述的,包括WaveTek、ADG、Murphy’s Waves、Barr + Wray以及白水在内的多家公司,曾成功交付了众多项目,这些项目真实展现了制造可供冲浪的波浪所需的内在运作机制。回顾这些项目,我们可以看到技术——以及由此推动的人工造浪行业——的发展始终是循序渐进的。作为行业共同体,我们已摸索出哪些方法行之有效(哪些行不通),这使我们走到了今天——围绕冲浪乐园的新兴产业已然形成。   白水超过35年的合伙人 Andrew Wray 技术转折点 最重要的是,我们所有的项目,无论是气动还是液压造浪系统,都运用了波浪排列和波浪阻尼。这是大冲浪项目中的重要缺失。大冲浪项目以Phillip…
了解更多

回顾造浪池发展历史中技术飞跃的几次里程碑时刻(一)

Andrew Wray, Partner at WhiteWater 我参与造浪池建设已有数十年之久,具体时间长到我都不愿细数了,但在我看来,过去几年间这一领域发生了质的飞跃,冲浪乐园产业正真正开始步入正轨。关于冲浪运动的爆炸式增长及其全球吸引力如何推动新项目热潮,我无需多言;相反,这让我不禁回想起波浪池数十年来丰富多彩的发展历程。 你也许会感到惊讶,造浪池的历史可以追溯到1870年代巴伐利亚国王的地下水径,人们在洞穴中交际,并体验其中的涟漪。又或许你更熟悉的是,建于1969年的亚利桑那州坦佩的大冲浪(Big Surf),它被认为是造浪池的原型。这两个案例都是里程碑,当然其间还有很多历史。然而,在造浪池历史上有这样一个时代,它奠定了造浪池技术层面成功的基础,却时常被忽视。   1934年,伦敦一座造浪池的概念图。尽管波浪的幅度还不足以“乘浪”,但也接近了………
了解更多